Targeted Individuals have a very big case, as the crimes carried out against us are very serious — and make no mistake, they are crimes. The “experiment” excuse is a bogus cop-out. Due to the magnitude of the case, a single attorney or smaller firm is not the way to go, but if you feel like that is the right path for you, then by all means pursue it. The beauty of America, and our legal system, is that it’s an ever expanding body of precedents and case law, and anyone can get involved in the process — don’t be intimidated by it. So if you disagree, then I truly hope you pursue your own legal strategy as well. I’m not an attorney, however, the legal team that is advising me realizes that it will take a large coalition of litigation powerhouses to try this case. I agree 100%, and I'll be putting everything I have into this strategy.
Why do we think this? We are taking on powerful and corrupt people, and institutions, associated with the deep state, in a case that will be nearly as monumental as the civil rights cases, or the asbestos and tobacco litigation cases. Individual attorneys don’t have the man power, the research teams, and the clout to handle a case of this magnitude. Furthermore, they can be corrupted, intimidated, ridiculed, harassed, or overwhelmed. This is unlikely with a coalition, of hopefully, 100+ attorneys representing thousands of plaintiffs in a class action. Therefore, a large litigation firm, or a large team of powerful and experienced attorneys, is needed.
In order to get a coalition of attorneys to take us seriously, we are putting together a professional outline and executive summary relating to the research on targeted individuals and electromagnetic weapons; the admissions to these types of crimes in Congressional hearings and FOIA requests (and their intention to engage in mind control on the American people); the whistleblowers’ statements; the victims’ statements (which is valid eye-witness testimony); and the scientific studies performed by civilian and military researchers that outline the non-thermal effects of electromagnetic weapons — not to mention the ever-growing list of very credible and credentialed victim / whistleblowers on BiggerThanSnowden.com.
In short, we will show these powerful litigation firms that we have a preponderance of evidence, so overwhelming, that they will be very eager to take our case — especially in times when many attorneys are looking for work.
The ultimate goal for targeted individuals is obviously getting our freedom back and exposing these human rights violations. However, we will be seeking financial damages as well, because the torture, lost wages, and health effects we have experienced are horrendous. Primarily though, the financial damages are what will attract these powerful litigation firms to work with us. I’ve studied litigation relating to cases that involved abuse, enslavement, harassment, attempted murder, sadistic torture, etc.. And based on comparisons, I truly believe that we have a case that will make the awards handed out during asbestos and tobacco litigation pale in comparison. We obviously want a firm that cares about social justice, but in reality we have to give them financial incentives as well. Since most targeted individuals are destitute victims, it makes sense to get a firm that will work on contingency. This will increase the attorney’s compensation in the long run as well, and it is a very common compensation structure within the litigation arena. In summary, with the executive summary, we are very confident that a large alliance of litigators will take us very seriously; realize the importance of this case; and realize the very realistic financial rewards to be gained from taking this case on contingency.
When the litigation firm(s) are signed on, we will really start organizing all targeted individuals that want to be plaintiffs. This will be done in a number of ways. One method will use affidavits from friends, coworkers or fellow activists, and family members. We will look into the use of biomarkers as well, and urge TIs to start taking blood samples on a regular basis. There’s a growing list of these biomarkers, such as, high triglycerides and adrenal tumors. Implants and RFID scanning might even play a role. Furthermore, all the evidence in the executive summary will be expanded to create an invincible case.
Finally, we litigate. The goal is to have something going by mid-2017. We will have our choice of jurisdictions, and we will keep filing cases in every federal and state jurisdiction in this country, until we win and get these human rights violations stopped once and for all. There's no doubt that we can convince a jury of 12 people that we have the truth behind us.
Any set backs will not deter us and will be viewed as intermediate victories. This is because public awareness of the Monarch Program, and its technology, is the achilles heel of these perpetrators. The public awareness our lawsuit brings will be a victory in and of itself, it will also embolden more whistleblowers to come forward — many of whom might have expert testimony and more evidence to provide, but are scared of being harassed or ridiculed if they expose it now, by themselves.
I’ve spent over $50,000 of my savings engaging in activism in the past year (not to mention the lost wages), and I’m selling off the remaining assets I have to make this a reality. Our freedom is priceless, the preservation of Democracy is priceless, and as history repeatedly shows, David can defeat Goliath.
I am a Targeted Individual ("TI"). I am trying to raise awareness of the subject and combat disinformation. We all want these human rights abuses to end immediately. Please email your targeted individual experiences and testaments to me. You can find my testament on the about page of this site.